Monday, April 04, 2005

Kansans Vote on the Definition of Marriage

Our local New York Times Editorialist has made some typical comments from the left wing viewpoint again. Tomorrow Kansas will vote on the Marriage amendment to the Kansas Constitution. The liberal mind in Kansas says we do not need this amendment since gay marriage is already illegal .

I have a question. If it is already illegal, what is wrong with it being in the Constitution? Or do the liberals have some secret plans to take the law to court to declare it unconstitutional? Since other states (such as The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts) are trying to overthrow God's Law, how else is Kansas supposed to protect itself from the will of the leftist court?

What has been amazing to me though, is the amount of ministers who say God's Word and Law are unclear as to this subject. One church in my own denomination is struggling with this issue. When pastors say God's Word is not sufficient, it is no wonder that liberal churches are struggling.

This morning's KJIL news played clips of minister after minister saying that the Bible doesn't call homosexuality sin. I am not sure what Bible they are reading, but they need to stop trying to be "IN" with liberal scholarship.

The real issue is becoming the clarity and perspecuity of God's Word. If God is not clear on defining sin, then what is Grace? It is no wonder that most Evanjellycal churches today could not define the gospel, including many in my own church.

Marriage is the cornerstone of a healthy society. If God's first institution falls, so does society.

2 comments:

FX Turk said...

Who knew Kansas was so gay?

Howard Fisher said...

Just for your information, the Amendment passed in Scott County by 87% to 13%. Approximately 1250 votes to 200. And the courts think they are not activists?