The Double Standard of Science

Let me clarify a little futher about the "truth" of evolution. I have asked enough evolutionists to know that the different theories that are put forth are just that, theories. They are theories or mechanisms by which scientists are searching to figure out how evolution happened.

In other words, evolution is tue, scientists just don't know for certain how it happened. So they don't know when it happened for certain, how it happened for certain, where it happened for certain or anything else for certain, but it did happened. In a public debate, I remember listening to one evolutionist argue that, "Hey, evolution must have happened because we are here."

What is being ASSUMED is that evolution is true, now let's prove it. Is that science? I thought the definition of science was supposed to be atheistic, naturalistic, materialistic? I thought science by it's own definition was to be led where the evidence takes you. Yet, science is attempting to prove what it already believes. If I do that with the Bible, that is considered circular reasoning, but if an evolutionary scientist does it, it is simply science. Slight double standard?

Let God Be True, and Every Man a Liar